We stand at the precipice of
a great opportunity. The government of China is doing what governments do by
going state on Hong Kong. The leaders there correctly perceive HK as a threat to their power and way of life. While I continue to predict that in the long run HK will eat China rather than the other way around, there are alternatives.
Many are suggesting a policy tool to challenge Beijing is to
open borders to HK emigration. This is a classic tails we don't lose, heads we win situation. To wit: If China balks, HK keeps its autonomy and the progress of freedom marches on; if China digs in, we get a giant gift. I'm sure you can see the first case, but I expect the second case is a bit harder to swallow. Allow me to explain the benefits of
Open Borders with this extreme example.
A few years ago I had the pleasure of visiting HK. Although I was fairly familiar with it, I was still
completely amazed. I look forward to one day returning. At the time I planned on doing a post about the HK economy in comparison to my native Oklahoma economy. Unfortunately, I didn't get around to it, but I think I can quickly summarize one of the economic points I wanted to make:
Hong Kong is 138% more productive than Oklahoma and most of that difference is because of population. The average Hongkonger is only 25% more productive than the average Oklahoman. And that is despite/because HK has much less land area on which to work. Key takaway: More people equals more opportunity.
(sources below) | Population | Area | 2019 GDP (PPP) | 2019 GPD per capita (PPP) |
Oklahoma | 3.95 million | 69k sq miles | $206 billion | $52,150 |
Hong Kong | 7.45 million | 1k sq miles | $491 billion | $64,928 |
% difference | 89% | -99% | 138% | 25% |
My extreme example to illustrate the benefits of Open Borders begins with a bold proposition: I propose we open the borders of Oklahoma to ALL residents of Hong Kong to become permanent guests with the opportunity to become citizens if they so wish.
I can already hear the dismissive laughter followed by the panicked apoplexy. "Dear God, you can't be serious!"
Of course I am! This is easy. Do you think there is something magical about the small island of Hong Kong? Well,
there might be, but it is nothing a little policy changing can't fix. And fortunately Oklahoma is not too far off from the HK freedom trail.
"But wouldn't that influx crash the local economy? Think of all those mouths to feed."
Yes, and think of all those hands to work and minds to think!
The one big stumbling block to a massive migration like this would be finding a place to house all the people. Well, Oklahoma has 69 times as much space as HK and construction here is cheap.
Not convinced? The heart of my extreme example is how this would affect my personal employment. When I was in HK, it was for a couple of
CFA Institute conferences. While there I was treated to a personal tour of part of the city by the president of the
Hong Kong CFA society. We had a chance to chat about our relative societies--I was president of
CFA Society Oklahoma at the time. His society was one of the world's largest with about 6,700 members. Mine was one of the smallest with only about 170.
So what would happen if 6,700 CFA charterholders began migrating to Oklahoma? Would there be pressure on my job? Probably not immediately as people aren't as interchangeable as classical economics assumes. Over time there would be competitive pressures, but so too would there be competitive gains. With that massive increase in talent would come much in the way of business opportunities. I would have new job offers as well as a bunch of new job competitors. Would the net effect be to lower my wages? Maybe, but even here there less to worry about.
The median total compensation* for a charterholder in HK is about 4%
higher than for a charterholder in Oklahoma. While the
cost of living in HK is perhaps 67% higher than in Oklahoma, most of that is housing, which remember is much easier to come by in OK. And for those like me who own a home, this influx should greatly increase my personal wealth.
Think about it this way: Should current charterholders in HK want more or fewer charterholders in HK? The instinctual answer is as simple as it is wrong--fewer sounds good until you answer the question of how would there be fewer. A shrinking market for any type of employment is not good for those in that line of employment. As a native charterholder I stand to gain much if other charterholders want to migrate to my community. The likely worst-case scenario isn't that I lose my job and/or take a massive pay cut. It is that my job changes and new opportunities force me to make some changes. Change is scary, but change is inevitable. I would much rather have the trends of change as tailwinds than crosswinds much less headwinds. Growth is good.
Open borders in Oklahoma for Hong Kong citizens is unfortunately not going to happen. And even if it did, 8 million people would not show up tomorrow. In fact, most would choose not to make the journey at all. But for those that did it would be a great benefit for those already in the place of their reception.
Sources for data in table:
*CFA charterholder compensation data is from CFA Institute's 2019 Compensation Survey, which is proprietary to members--unfortunately, I can't directly share it.